Accessibility Checklist for Tabletop Games: Make Your Next Design Dad-Friendly (and More)

Make your next tabletop design truly playable — for dads, grandparents, and everyone in between

Designers, publishers, and prototypers: you want your game on tables, not stuck in closets because someone at the family table can’t read the text, pick up a token, or follow a turn. Accessibility is no longer a niche checkbox; it’s a market expectation and a community imperative in 2026. Inspired by Elizabeth Hargrave’s approach when designing Sanibel for her dad, this practical, measurable accessibility checklist walks you through component design, font and contrast choices, cognitive-load reductions, rule pacing, and variant rules that make games truly family- and elder-friendly.

Why accessibility matters — and why now

By late 2025 and into 2026 the tabletop ecosystem shifted. Publishers expanded high-contrast print runs, conventions flagged accessible demo tables, and tooling (including accessible print-on-demand and AI-assisted rule summarizers) made inclusive options cheaper and faster to develop. At the same time, a large segment of the tabletop audience is aging: many designers test prototypes with parents or older playtesters, and that lived-experience feedback is shaping core design decisions. Elizabeth Hargrave’s design process for Sanibel — explicitly informed by playing with her dad — is a model: design with an actual user in mind, not hypothetical personas.

Key takeaway

Start accessibility work early. Fixing contrast, font size, and iconography in final art is expensive. Treat these as core mechanics that affect usability and enjoyment, not as post-production fixes.

High-level checklist: What to do and why (quick)

• Font & typographic clarity: target readable sizes and legible typefaces.
• Visual contrast: meet WCAG-inspired contrast targets for text and iconography.
• Component ergonomics: weight, shape, texture, and size matter for grasp and manipulation.
• Rule pacing & structure: chunk information, add quick-starts, and provide progressive learning variants.
• Variant rules for cognitive accessibility: scaffold complexity and provide default or assisted options.
• Playtesting with elder players: recruit, measure, iterate.

Design specs and measurable targets

Below are concrete targets you can apply during prototyping and production. Use them as spec items in art briefs and QA lists.

1. Font size & typography

• Main body text (cards, boards, player aids): 14–18 pt equivalent (printed size). For small cards choose 16 pt minimum.
• Headers and key numbers: 20–28 pt (or larger for high-impact items like scores and endgame triggers).
• Typefaces: prefer open, geometric sans-serifs (Fira Sans, Inter, Open Sans). Avoid condensed and decorative fonts for functional text.
• Letter spacing & case: slightly increased tracking (+2–5%) improves legibility. Avoid ALL CAPS for instructions and long phrases.
• Icon labeling: pair icons with short text labels — icons alone increase cognitive load for new or sporadic players.

2. Visual contrast & color guidance

Use WCAG contrast concepts adapted to tabletop surfaces.

• Normal-size text contrast: aim for a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 between text and background.
• Large text (headers): 3:1 is acceptable, but higher contrast improves readability under different lighting conditions at conventions and living rooms.
• Color palettes: avoid relying on color alone to communicate game states. Always add shape, pattern, or icon redundancy.
• Color-blind accessibility: include palettes tested against protanopia and deuteranopia. Tools and simulators are widely available in 2026—use them during the art pass.

3. Component ergonomics: weight, size, and texture

People with reduced fine-motor strength or manual dexterity benefit from components designed for easier handling.

• Tokens: diameter 20–28mm for primary tokens; thickness 3–6mm. Use slightly domed or beveled edges to make picking up easier.
• Stones / gems / meeples: choose heavier materials or add weight to give tactile feedback. Lightweight plastic tokens can be frustrating to pick up off fabric tablecloths.
• Cards: satin or linen finish improves grip. Consider larger card sizes for key player-facing information.
• Dice: offer or recommend large (16–20mm) dice with high-contrast pips and rounded corners.
• Storage trays and boards: rounded edges, tapered wells, and raised lips make retrieval easier for limited-hand mobility.

Rule design: pacing, clarity, and cognitive load

Rules are the interface between designer intent and player experience. Think like a UX designer: reduce friction, anticipate errors, and scaffold learning.

4. Rulebook structure — practical layout checklist

• One-page Quick Start: Setup diagram, brief turn flow, and first three actions. Must be digestible in 2–3 minutes.
• Setup diagram: large, labeled, with numbered steps. Include component callouts with sizes to avoid confusion.
• Example turn: a fully-worked example with annotated photos. Visuals reduce cognitive load faster than paragraphs.
• Index & glossary: simple index plus a one-page cheat sheet for icon meanings and keywords.
• Progressive learn mode: separate section with a 3–5 game scenario campaign that introduces mechanics gradually.
• Large-print rule edition: offer a downloadable, large-print PDF (18–20 pt) and text-to-speech friendly markup.

5. Reduce cognitive load with turn design

Cognitive load spikes when players must hold multiple rules in working memory. Design to minimize that.

• Limit branching decisions: consider default options or “suggested moves” for players who prefer fewer choices.
• Chunk action lists: present actions as 3–5 clear options with consequences explained in one sentence each.
• Use prompts on player boards: sequence actions visually so players don’t have to remember order.
• Turn timers (optional): for players who enjoy faster play; always allow them to be switched off for more relaxed sessions.

Variant rules for cognitive accessibility (dad‑friendly and beyond)

Offer optional variants that reduce complexity without dumbing down the experience. These should be playtested and labeled clearly in the rulebook as accessibility variants.

6. Simple, effective variant examples

• Guided play: one player acts as “guide” for a round and can suggest moves. Works well for mixed-ability groups.
• Reduced-choice mode: limit available actions to the top 3 based on player board state (visual highlights). Great for players who prefer less decision fatigue.
• Scaffolded scoring: simplify scoring by removing multipliers or hidden goals; replace them with direct point gains.
• Cooperative side-mode: switch to a co-op objective where players work together; cooperative modes reduce competitive pressure and memory load.
• Assisted engine (app/card): provide an optional ‘hint-card’ or companion app that suggests 2–3 good moves per turn. AI-assisted hints became mainstream in 2025 and are now a common optional feature.

Playtesting: recruit, measure, and iterate

Testing with target users — including elder family members — is the most reliable way to catch usability gaps early. Hargrave’s method of testing with her dad is a blueprint: real feedback from actual players beats assumptions.

7. Recruitment & session design

• Recruit diverse ages: aim for at least 3–5 playtest sessions with players aged 55+, mixed familiarity with modern board games.
• Moderated sessions: watch for setup errors, hesitation, and requests for clarification. Don’t lead — observe, then ask targeted questions.
• Remote testing: provide physical kits and run video sessions; record setup and first 30 minutes for analysis.

8. Metrics & feedback loop

Measure things you can improve.

• Time to first decision: average time between completing setup and first meaningful decision. Target: under 3–5 minutes for family games.
• Setup time: target 5–10 minutes for games under 90 minutes. If elders take longer, revise setup diagrams or pre-setup options.
• Error rate: track mis-plays or misinterpretations per session. If >2 per game on core rules, simplify wording or add in-rule checks.
• Satisfaction score: 1–5 Likert scale after play; ask what caused frustration and what improved enjoyment.

Production & fulfillment: packaging accessibility into your product

Accessibility planning extends into manufacturing and fulfillment. Decisions here affect retail discoverability and user satisfaction.

9. Physical production notes

• Offer a large-print edition as print-on-demand: reduces inventory risk and meets elder-player needs.
• Package accessibility add-ons: include tactile stickers, high-contrast player aids, and a quick-start laminated sheet in the box.
• Component swap options: consider selling a token upgrade kit (heavier materials, larger dice) as an add-on in 2026 marketplaces.

10. Digital companions

• Rules PDF with TTS tags: ensure downloadable rules are structured so text-to-speech tools read them logically.
• Companion apps: optional apps that provide step-by-step setup, read-aloud rules, and hint systems are widely accepted by players in 2026.

Case study: What Hargrave’s process teaches us

"Designing for a specific player — my dad — helped me make Sanibel more approachable without compromising depth."

That approach offers a replicable method: pick a real person with defined needs and design for them. Use that prototype user to focus decisions. For Hargrave, the outcome was a game that retained strategic depth while becoming friendlier at the table. Translating that into your design process looks like this:

1. Identify a real person (e.g., a parent familiar with casual games).
2. Define 3 usability goals (readability, manipulation, rule clarity).
3. Create a low-fidelity prototype and run a short playtest.
4. Iterate on the three areas quickly; prioritize changes that reduce friction most.

Quick-start accessibility checklist (printable)

Stick this on your design wall or include it in your playtest kit.

• Typography: Body 14–18 pt; headers 20–28 pt; sans-serif; no ALL CAPS.
• Contrast: Text/background ≥ 4.5:1 (aim higher for game boards).
• Tokens: Primary tokens ≥20mm diameter; textured; slightly weighted.
• Dice: Offer 16–20mm with high-contrast pips.
• Rulebook: One-page Quick Start + annotated example turn + large-print PDF.
• Variants: Include at least one reduced-choice and one cooperative/coaching mode.
• Playtest: 3 sessions with 55+ players; measure time-to-first-decision, setup time, error rate.

Advanced strategies for designers and publishers

Once you’ve implemented baseline accessibility, apply advanced techniques to broaden appeal and longevity.

• Design for modular complexity: let players add rule modules over sessions instead of absorbing full rules in one go.
• Publish accessibility reports: include an accessibility section on your product page that lists features and known limitations. Transparency builds trust and helps customers make informed purchases.
• Partner with retailers: request accessible display promos at FLGS and online stores; in 2026 many stores maintain accessible game shelves or filters.
• Community contributions: host a public repository of community-made large-print cards and tactile stickers (licensed appropriately) so long as quality is verified.

Playtest script & survey (ready to copy)

Use this exact script during moderated sessions.

1. Introduce the game and state you’re testing the clarity and comfort of materials.
2. Ask the player to set up alone while you observe. Time setup and note questions asked.
3. Allow the player to play the first round; do not intervene unless safety or core misinterpretation occurs.
4. After the round, ask: What was confusing? What felt physically awkward? What would make this easier to pick up next time?

Survey (1–5): Overall enjoyment; Ease of setup; Clarity of goals; Physical comfort handling pieces; Likelihood to teach the game to a friend.

Final thoughts: accessibility as design opportunity

Designing for accessibility is not a limitation — it’s an opportunity to sharpen your rules, clarify your interface, and reach a wider audience. Thinking like Elizabeth Hargrave and designing with a real person in mind produces games that are richer at the table and more resilient in the market. As tools and expectations evolve through 2026, accessible designs will increasingly define the next wave of bestsellers and community favorites.

Actionable next steps

• Apply the quick-start checklist to your current prototype and run one elder playtest this week.
• Export a large-print PDF of your rules and test with text-to-speech tools.
• Tag your rulebook or product page with an “Accessibility” note listing the features and variant rules available.

Call to action

Use this checklist on your next prototype and tell us how it changed play. Share before-and-after photos, playtest metrics, or an accessibility note from your product page — we’ll feature standout examples and practical case studies on boardgames.news. Join the conversation and help make the hobby truly playable for everyone at the table.

Related Reading

• Role-Play and Touch: A Practical Workshop to Practice Non-Defensive Responses
• Designing a Balcony Bike Nook: Curtains and Covers for Storing E-Bikes Safely
• Amiibo Unlocks vs Casino Collectibles: How Physical Merch Drives Digital Engagement
• Why Personalized Nutrition Platforms Are the Next Big Thing: AI, Microbiome, and Privacy in 2026
• Rapid Prototyping LLM UIs with Raspberry Pi: Offline Demos for Stakeholder Buy-in